A charming young handicapped man in college, in his early twenties, sees an older woman. The female's speed attracts him. The young man runs in the woman's direction, making the situation seem like he needs to hurry. He drops his books knowingly, and as he bends down to pick up all the scattered books that had previously escaped his grasp, the female recognizes the man's broken arm. He begins to help the young man without asking. He got a smug look on his face, an unpleasant and uneasy look. The man looks at her, mercilessly, and knees the defenseless woman in her youthful face. The female unexpectedly endured dragging herself to the wildly young man's vehicle. The young man nonchalantly rushed to his house where he had already committed several murders without any remorse. As the long, bumpy car ride startled and slowly woke the confused young woman, she noticed something. Something strange. She realizes that the once charming young man has kidnapped her; he had no idea where he was going. Trying to remember her thoughts, the man knocks her out with heartless laughter. He takes the unaware and still unconscious woman to his bedroom. In a rage familiar to man, he breaks a steel bed bar. He begins to unbutton the woman's blue jeans. He gently takes them off along with his underwear, as if he can't predict what will happen next. She grabs the cold bedpost and ruthlessly thrusts it into her vagina. This story is true and the young woman experienced the torment of what the man caused her and told her story. Ted Bundy plays this character and received the death sentence for assaulting and committing murder on defenseless women. There are many... in the middle of the paper... who promote the death penalty and they didn't show a 32% difference. In any federal system today, minor or permanent errors could appear if it displayed information based on a human statement as evidence. However, the risk of making an error of judgment with the particularly lengthy process adopted in all death penalty cases is minimal, and there appears to be no reliable information showing that an innocent individual received a wrongful conviction in a 1976 case . Believed by many, the case contained information heavily based on racial bias. The tradition of racial bias and discrimination will always be present in the courts. No justice system is one hundred percent correct and makes the right decision, but based on the evidence and care in examining the evidence, if someone commits wrongful conduct worthy of the death penalty, they should be allowed..