These three points of view recognize that mechanical progress is based on the need for man to survive and address various issues. They also recognize that evaluating innovation starts with the need for more relevant information. The perspectives on the evaluation of innovation are similar and completely different, for example Lenski believes that innovation and civic institution proceed at a similar pace while Toffler recognizes that development far exceeds current improvement leading to future faltering. Leslie's enthusiasm is quite different from that described by Toffler and Lenski because he seems to recognize that the need to rein in vitality is the only driver of mechanical development. In light of the above, I firmly believe that Gerald Lenski's view on mechanical progress is the most useful. Innovations arise from human needs and in this way mechanical advancements are made to meet the current needs of that particular era, for example, the need for a more noteworthy match driven to the progress of the