Topic > Comparison between Symphony and Liberty - 810

Liberty (v5)Supplier: Softlink www.softlinkint.com/libertyLiberty is simple while still having all the features any library would require! Liberty is committed to growing and changing along with the needs of individual libraries, and would likely be better suited to a specialty library. While having fully integrated core modules (designed to save the user time), Liberty also has a number of additional modules that can be integrated into the system. Some of these are Liberty Cloud, OverDrive and Z-Catlogging. There are also some useful subscription-based add-ons such as Syndetics Solutions and Web Services API. There are a couple of features of this LMS that greatly benefit the user/user. With the Library Link Applicator it is possible to connect to library services through various digital devices, such as iPhones and smartphones. The search options are also a fabulous tool, as they create a larger sphere in which to find items. Liberty's engagement with users includes things like book reviews, RSS feeds, and image search. A benefit for library staff is the full integration of Liberty features. which creates an easy to navigate system and the removal of redundant data entry. Efficiency is an obvious key thought with Liberty. The fact that it is fast and efficient is an added bonus. A simple, easy-to-use interface, quick and easy check-in for select items, a fully integrated Z39.50 portal for quick cataloging, a powerful search engine that provides immediate resources, and a wealth of helpful technologies (such as interfaces to engage customers), all contribute to ensuring an enjoyable experience for both the library and users. Liberty is definitely a versatile LMS, offering users...... middle of the paper... users. Both are efficient in design, offer powerful search functions and room for technological growth. And both have great security features. Symphony also has a built-in offline mode that can be used whenever network or power outages occur. While Symphony and Liberty both show real care and commitment to the user, only Symphony appears to have the online account solution, which allows users to make requests and manage their account. Comparing these two ILMSs and noting the many similarities and differences was a very enlightening experience: becoming aware of how ILMSs can really help a library better serve users with the many modules and features they offer .Works CitedSoftlink (used also the 'Liberty' brochure) www.softlinkint.com/libertySirsiDynix www.sirsidnyix.com/symphony