Napoleon Bonaparte: hero or tyrant? The Napoleonic era and the French Revolution were times of rapid social and political transformations and France found itself at the center of events in Europe. The French Mutiny and the subsequent period of Napoleonic conflicts brought about philosophical transformations that produced the new Europe. The French mutiny divided the Church from the State and blocked the human rights of the dignified classes and in 1793 the French Republic was recognized. These transformations essentially forced the response of the old European kingdom which was mainly scared of the innovative thoughts that would be “exported” from France. Despite the military and political involvement, the thoughts of the mutiny extended to the whole of Europe and on the contrary were extremely rooted in the rational customs of European antiquity and the thoughts of self-determination and equal opportunities were also one of the vital perceptions. of the 18th century, enlightenment was considered a way of life. These thoughts were bestowed by still absolutist thinkers and royal families such as the Prussian Emperor Frederick the Great or the Russian Empress Catherine the Great; however they are based on simple perceptions for most of the 18th century. It was precisely in the summer of 1789 that in France the so-called Third Estate created the nationalized legislative body and appointed itself the motivating tribune of the people. On July 14, the Paris public invaded the Bastille castle and the French mutiny broke out. As has already been stated, the thoughts of freedom and correspondence were not creations of the mutiny; on the other hand, it was during this period that they were initially staged. At the end of the 18th century, in connection with the French mutiny, new national states and the command public contribution plan appeared. The mutiny is also a symbol of the constitution of the local society and the French bill of 1791 (following the United States of America) affirmed the social equality of all societies and their absolute rights (Asprey, pp. 103-104) . Napoleon Bonaparte was a tyrant and oppressor of his public and others. It underwent a lasting and useful transformation, but its actions also led to the deaths of millions of people and the enduring hostility of much of Europe, especially Spain and Russia (Lugli, Alessandro, et al. pp .53-57 ). Napoleon was a tyrant and ruler because he gave up French standards of independence, poverty, and equality. He was the next person who always linked Europe, but he did not reach that goal. He had so much authority and he used it to become a tyrant. Everyone insulted him and wanted to amuse him. Cartoonists made fun of him with cartoons, and the audience laughed at how he was so small, but with a huge cap and a belly. Napoleon committed three great and enormous sins; peninsular war, continental structure and Russian incursion. Everything he managed to achieve was useless. In November 1806, Napoleon erected a barrier (a large, aggressive closure of ports) to prevent all communication and trade with European nations and Great Britain. Napoleon called this strategy the “continental scheme,” because it was invented to make continental Europe more independent. Napoleon also proposed to demolish Britain's industrial economy and commercial economy. Napoleon's barrier was not sufficiently rigid, so much so that they asked the English for help; smugglers administered to transport cargoes from Great Britain into