Role of Colonial Presence in Indian Tea Plantation... 'India with the least possible means of corrupt influence, which effectively established a concrete link between the actions of the East India Company and the approval of the royal government, since the products of the East India Company were seen as "necessary" returns for public funds and the trust placed in the company common shares, parliament was responsible for raising finances to pay for trade, the company's power to authorize letters and make laws gave the company the sovereign authority of many Indian provinces. The new regime of the East India Company served as a precedent for later tea plantation like the Assam Company and for businesses using methods of manipulation and profiteering, the accumulation of personal wealth was one of the main intentions, first in 1834 they were enacted the Wasteland Rules to allow government-granted land to be revenue-free for 20 years. Legislation marginalized Indian workers and farmers, the cycle of debt and dependency shackled workers to a life of exploitation. The essential feature of plantation legislation, especially in the early stages of its development, was regulated by a contract between planters and workers by which the latter were bound under sanctions; To work for the former for a certain period of time, the purpose of the legislations was to secure the planters the services of their recruits, as well as a secure hold on the workers. The most compelling examples of exploitation were in the field of labor recruitment, as the underlying objective was to keep labor costs as low as possible to increase profits and staff... female workers were an essential element for female workers, but with the abolition of this law some of these concessions were withdrawn. Rana Pratap Behal in his work “Wage Structure and Work in the Assam Valley Tea Plantation” expresses the fact that the variation between the wages of men and women was totally arbitrary and discriminatory, women and children were paid less, the hours work the work was the same carried out by both men and women, furthermore women carried out most of the jobs carried out by men such as hoeing and also pruning, in fact the workers were also specialized in plucking, furthermore there were no complaints nor in the official stories nor in The Indian Trade Association reports that women do less work than men, so it appears that the variation between male and female wages has been created solely on the basis of conventional values of sex discrimination.

Topic > Role of Colonial Presence in Indian Tea Plantation... 'India with the least possible means of corrupt influence, which effectively established a concrete link between the actions of the East India Company and the approval of the royal government, since the products of the East India Company were seen as "necessary" returns for public funds and the trust placed in the company common shares, parliament was responsible for raising finances to pay for trade, the company's power to authorize letters and make laws gave the company the sovereign authority of many Indian provinces. The new regime of the East India Company served as a precedent for later tea plantation like the Assam Company and for businesses using methods of manipulation and profiteering, the accumulation of personal wealth was one of the main intentions, first in 1834 they were enacted the Wasteland Rules to allow government-granted land to be revenue-free for 20 years. Legislation marginalized Indian workers and farmers, the cycle of debt and dependency shackled workers to a life of exploitation. The essential feature of plantation legislation, especially in the early stages of its development, was regulated by a contract between planters and workers by which the latter were bound under sanctions; To work for the former for a certain period of time, the purpose of the legislations was to secure the planters the services of their recruits, as well as a secure hold on the workers. The most compelling examples of exploitation were in the field of labor recruitment, as the underlying objective was to keep labor costs as low as possible to increase profits and staff... female workers were an essential element for female workers, but with the abolition of this law some of these concessions were withdrawn. Rana Pratap Behal in his work “Wage Structure and Work in the Assam Valley Tea Plantation” expresses the fact that the variation between the wages of men and women was totally arbitrary and discriminatory, women and children were paid less, the hours work the work was the same carried out by both men and women, furthermore women carried out most of the jobs carried out by men such as hoeing and also pruning, in fact the workers were also specialized in plucking, furthermore there were no complaints nor in the official stories nor in The Indian Trade Association reports that women do less work than men, so it appears that the variation between male and female wages has been created solely on the basis of conventional values of sex discrimination.