Serres and Clifford discuss the nature of time, the “contact zone” and knowledge as a mobile confluence of flows. Which transmits the multiplicity of knowing and being, the flows of time within cultures. Traditionally, according to Serres, science prescribes a static and fixed subject. It has reproduced a permanent system of being, even if it claims to be a process of becoming. Serres believes it is best to paint a kind of floating picture of relationships and relationships, as if showing a wondrous network of bifurcations, some of which intermingle or silt up, while others open up like a passing cloud of angels. We thus see that a new paradigm is taking shape in the social sciences in the form of mobility. Some recent contributions to the formation and stabilization of this new paradigm include the work of anthropology, cultural studies, geography, migration studies, science and technology studies, tourism studies, and sociology. Without social studies science there is no increase in the fluency of a far-reaching approach. mobility systems. Such mobility includes wire and cable systems, the distribution of multimedia satellites, cell phone antennas that allow invisible wave channels to carry mobile messages, and the massive infrastructures that organize the physical movement of people and goods. Mobility also includes movements of images and information in local, national and global media. The concept of communications infrastructures such as the Internet, cell phones, and mass media has influenced the increasingly embedded language of computers. Hence the hybridity of the systems that share technology and society outside those divergent places that are produced and reproduced. Making aeroterminals become more and more like cities, and cities are because... middle of paper ......that this is a global technological moment, yet I live in an inscribed national space. I feel vulnerable because it seems like spaces of disconnection and reconnection have become more dangerous. This shadow space absurdly includes questions of citizenship as a framework of belonging. As a legal foreigner, I have always and already suspected that the identity of the definition of citizenship in times of crisis is very limited and that this unconscious ignorance of time and academic conception is very limited. This desire that Serres and Clifford seek to articulate is about the disruption and benefit of those who might be seen as messengers in the space and that this is an important awareness from within the student. Both seem to agree that it has become a space to highlight the cracks in how we are shaped and framed or how we can counteract that..