Science and religion have always been in debate since the sanity of humanity. While science has proven itself with logical truths, religion has thrived with the faith and customs of its people. Can they both survive together? While the mere existence and origin of humankind has made us believe in multiple theories about God with various supernatural beings playing his part, it directly negates Darwin's theory that all humanity is the successor of apes. Or is the Big Bang theory just a redundant theory of all scientific research. So let's go back to where all life began. Times when our ancestors lived in caves, they hunted for food in berries and trees. A natural phenomenon would perhaps trigger thunder and our ancestors would look at the sky with fearful, fearful eyes and hands outstretched in submission. There were times when the earth trembled and even worse times when the sea of ​​water flooded, taking his shelter, food and friends with it. He began to feel, realize and associate his life and destiny in the hands of an invisible and supreme power to which he gave the name of God. And this is how God was born. But what about the origin of man? Wouldn't we have talked about Adam and Eve being created by God and heaven being broken and all hell being melted because of an apple? NO. We're talking about a long essay here with logical thoughts and rational words to choose from. And even more so I'm an atheist. It is believed that the basis of science was the observation and experiences that man has lived for centuries observing natural phenomena, experimenting with them of various kinds. Yet religion is considered and believed to be older than science. It was that God created man or was forced to let him be created by man.A more pr...... middle of paper ......ith. Just as a scientist can be a religious person, so a religious person can use his scientifically developed bicycle. While our life cannot be improved by any God, science cannot equally bridge the gap between religion and people's faith. Everyone has their own purpose and place. It only becomes random when both are inappropriately misplaced and overlapped. When scientific theories are mistakenly called religious dogma. Or when a person's religious space and way of life are violated with anti-religious accusations and racist positions in the name of science. Do they answer the same questions? What is important is whether they make us question our purpose and how much they succeed in making our life more meaningful and meaningful. I will let my readers ponder this. As someone had said: "Religion must not be discussed and solicited, but must be followed and believed." Who am I the mortal? !