'Is it ethical to have a child for the purpose of saving the life of another child?'Recent cases, high-profile films and books from around the world including the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States have brought a new type of IVF to the public's attention. “Embryo selection” means “Embryos are fertilized outside the body and only those with certain genes are selected and implanted in the uterus.” From now on this means that doctors are now able to select specific embryos and implant them into the mother of someone who might have another sick child in order to obtain genetic material such as bone marrow that will match the unlucky child and thus, hopefully , be able to save their child. life. Creating a "savior brother". “A child conceived through selective in vitro fertilization as a potential source of donor organs or cells for an existing brother or sister with a life-threatening medical condition,” a definition given by Oxford Dictionaries (1.0). Cases of this type are occurring all over the world and many are highly documented. The most famous case could be noted in the fictional book "My Sisters Keeper" by Jodi Picoult. I will discuss this further throughout my thesis and how books and films can influence views on certain ethical topics. Additionally, I will also discuss a number of factors such as certain religious beliefs and the physical creation of savior siblings versus the creation of custom children. Many have strong opinions both for and against the creation of savior brothers. A recent Court of Appeal ruling looked at pre-implantation selection and IVF and how it would eventually be banned in the UK. Therefore, there are many factors that need to be discussed to determine whether or not it should be outlawed… middle of paper… Chinese Yuan Renminbi. Which when converted into British Pounds £1,243,093.64. (1.4). It is becoming increasingly popular among some wealthy Chinese and becoming big business for many Americas; start a business to meet the high demand. Additionally, this will also allow the entire family to move to the United States when the child turns 21, allowing the entire family to have a better quality of life and a more prosperous future. This is therefore the extreme and is not mandatory. It's not about saving a life but about creating a so-called "perfect child" when that child grows up knowing that no one is perfect. Added to this there is also the argument that you could treat the child for the disease you know he has, however, he is just as likely to get another disease as someone who was conceived and born naturally.