Have you ever heard the name Frank Abagnale Jr? He is known for his past as a former scammer, check forger, and impostor when he was between the ages of 15 and 21. He became one of the most famous impostors, claiming to have assumed no fewer than eight identities, including an airline pilot, a doctor, a United States Bureau of Prisons agent, and a lawyer. His true story was written as fiction co-written by Stan Redding, and was adapted into a 2002 film of the same name by director Steven Spielberg, starring Leonardo DiCaprio as Abagnale and Tom Hanks as an FBI agent who chases him. no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Although the fiction and film are both based on Frank's story, they made changes to the plot. However, fiction and cinema have all retained some similarities. For example, the speaker, Frank Abagnale Jr, was the same between the two, even though the situation he was in was different. Even the audience was the same; Frank Abagnale wanted to tell his story to the world. The purpose of the book and the film is also similar. To tell people about Frank Abagnale Jr and his impressive robberies and scams. The contents shown in the film were all shown in the book, except for a few scenes, and both centered on the famous saying. And I think they both highlight the destructive side of parental divorce. In the film, sixteen-year-old Frank faced a life test, not the plight of his father's family on the verge of bankruptcy, not his difficulties from the transition from aristocratic school to ordinary high school, but the divorce of his loving parents. At the request of his lawyer, he had to write whether to choose a father or mother as his guardian. It was a choice he couldn't imagine, he wanted to choose an entire family, and his fond memories were fixed in the moment when his father and mother danced gracefully on the stable at home. He chose the third option out of two options and ran away. Furthermore, there are some sentences in the narrative that describe his family situation before leaving. “I left home at sixteen, looking for myself. There was no pressure on me to leave, even if I wasn't happy. The situation on my double internal front had not changed. Dad still wanted to win mom back and mom didn't want to be defeated. Dad was still using me as a mediator in his second courtship of Mom, and she still resented him for casting me as Cupid. I didn't like it. Mom had graduated from dental school and worked for a dentist in Larchmont. She seemed content with her new independent life. I had no intention of running away. But every time Dad put on his postal worker uniform and drove to work in his old car, I felt depressed. I couldn't forget how he wore Louis Roth suits and drove big, expensive cars.” After two paragraphs I draw a conclusion. Maybe in Frank's perspective his father's bankruptcy didn't defeat him, what truly defeated him was his broken family. This was the scarf that could take Frank's entire life to heal, so this very sad boy from then on began his "lonely and crazy" wanderings. Since there are similarities, there must be differences. In fact, I found many references to fiction and cinema. The writers added an original character in , an FBI agent named Carl Hanratty. Carl's creation was based on FBI agent Joseph Shea, the person who eventually captured Frank in France. Carl's character was very calm and full of tenacity, graspingFrank was the goal he wanted to achieve. To achieve this goal, he worked hard every day, however, he was always deceived by Frank's tricks and made him disappear from his sight. His appearance meant that the main character of the film was no longer just Frank. The narrative angle also changed from Frank's perspective to a back and forth between Frank's exploits and Carl, the FBI agent, chasing him. Such behavior brings a good effect on the dramatic conflict of the film. Dramatic conflict is the constant tension and motivation that produces the content of the story. It can also be said that nothing will move forward without conflict. Dramatic conflicts can be described as equivalent to problems in design practices or extraordinary opportunities that designers find in research. A dramatic conflict can be seen as a fight or struggle, taking into account the excitement of the narrative, in which the protagonist and his opposite are engaged in a long struggle. (website) As the plot of a film develops, more and more differences appear. Frank had a completely different family status in the film. He was the only child of his parents. His parents truly loved each other and the whole family lived a happy and warm life. Their house was filled with laughter and music at that time. Unfortunately, the peace was soon broken. Since Frank's father's stationery shop had a tax evasion problem, no bank was willing to lend money to old Frank. Desperately, the Franks moved to a smaller house. These various things caused a deep rift to emerge in the mother's close relationship with her father, and she eventually chose to divorce old Frank. When choosing who to live with in the future, Frank could not accept the sudden excitement, so he ran out of the house. Frank has three other brothers in fiction. His parents divorced due to conflicting opinions when he was a child. To take care of his father's emotions, Frank chose to live with him. No matter which version, both Franks had a great negative impact on the issue of parental divorce. It was precisely the film that amplified the negative effects, focusing on the image of a defenseless, sad and angry young man. As a chain reaction to the changing family situation, Frank's first deception was different. Frank's first act of deception in the film appeared when he was bullied by other kids after transferring to a new school. Since no one knew his real identity, in retaliation, he pretended that the French teacher let the boy who led the bullying against him read the text in public, and even drove the real French teacher away. Surprisingly, his disguise was discovered only a week later, during which he gave a lecture to the students in his class and wanted to organize a tour. Indeed, it seemed that Frank was posing as a teacher, but the subjects and time were somehow different. The breakdown described in the fiction occurs after his father gives Frank a Ford. He conspired with the tire store clerks to pretend to purchase necessary car equipment such as tires, batteries, and gasoline, but secretly let the clerks sell the equipment and work together to win. The fiction used some phrases to describe this scene: “How much would a series of white walls cost me?” I asked. “For this car, $160, but you have a good set of treads,” the man said. He looked at me and I knew he felt he was about to propose. “Yeah, I don’t really need tires,” I agreed. “But I had a bad case of shorts. I'll tell you what I'll do. I will buy a set ofthose tires and I will charge them to this card. I just don't take the tires. Give me $100 instead. You still have the tires, and when my dad pays Mobil for them, you'll get your share. You're ahead in the beginning and when you sell the tires, all $160 ends up in your pocket. What do you think? You're going to be a dragon, man. If you compare the two scams horizontally, you will find that the scams in the movie are like a childish child's mischievous pranks, with a lot of revenge and a prank. Such behavior gave Frank a great sense of satisfaction, as if he were the source of his happiness. Adding this entertainment to the film means adding a sense of humor to the film, so that the audience relaxes into the serious content. I prefer the film version of "Catch Me If You Can" over the fiction. Since I am an unimaginative person, it is difficult for the characters depicted in fiction to form a very specific image in my mind. This time I was very distressed, but the advent of the film actually solved my problems. Through the superb performances of the actors, a different, impressive personality appeared on the screen. Like the two protagonists of the film, the world-famous con man Frank and the FBI agent Carl. In Frank's spiritual world, one passage was deeply imprinted on his mind. 'Two little mice fell into a bucket of cream. The first mouse quickly gave up and drowned. The second mouse wouldn't give up. He fought so hard that he finally turned the cream into butter and crawled out. Gentlemen, from now on I am the second mouse." When old Frank Abagnale became a life member of the club, he went up on stage to give the thank you speech. He was a businessman who did not play by the rules and his business failed because he was investigated by the government for tax evasion. His life was unsuccessful, but his attitude towards life was a bad demonstration of his son, Frank Abagnale Jr. This line affected Frank deeply When he is abandoned in adult society, just like a mouse falling into the cream, she acts as a nun, but uses fraud to agitate society and escape her own predicament First by impersonating airline staff to fly more than 3 million kilometers for free, forging airline checks for almost 4 million dollars, and then becoming a hospital pediatrician, even more surprisingly, through self-study, obtaining the qualification of a lawyer in two months and becoming a lawyer. a state's attorney's assistant, he eventually became the youngest and most audacious liar in American history. If you don't explicitly talk about the hero and leave Frank in the movie breaking the law, he's one of the smartest people of his time, and it's fair to say he turned the second mouse into a magical thing. Although, in the film, whether Frank is sitting on the beauty or flying around the world, his heart was actually not what was seen on the surface, but full of enjoyment for life. In fact, it was a kind of displacement of loneliness and helplessness. Living under the lie, he can really enjoy the money and deception brought him a rich life in very few moments, most of the time he was worried, playing cat and mouse with the police. Behind the life of entertainment there was pain and discomfort. What Frank can't stand is a man having nowhere to tell the truth and the loneliness of wandering, living nowhere. So every Christmas, Frank calls Carl, the only agent who could talk to him. Carl is the other protagonist of the film, he was not a typical agent, he had neither the majesty nor the style, Carl did not have these federal The classic image of the agent, but his character is wooden and boring. But he had the same careful and delicate mind. But he had the same careful mind anddelicate. Indeed, Carl in the film gave me a great surprise. Although the film's description of Carl's life was not as detailed as Frank's, his character was more three-dimensional than in the novel. His middle-aged marriage failed, his daughter was cared for by his ex-wife, and he was lonely like little Frank, dedicating himself to his work to relieve loneliness. So Officer Carl and suspect Frank were friends of the enemy. The touching plot happened every Christmas, their fixed greeting. Even if it seemed like sarcasm, a provocation, a satire, derision. But they both knew from the bottom of their hearts that in the dimension of loneliness, they and their opponents actually pitied each other, they could only discharge the loneliness. Not only was the young con man chased and caught, but through several "confrontations" with each other, he heard Frank's heart, read Frank's soul, and finally understood him. Carl understood Frank's emotions and criminal motivations early on, he knew that Frank was just a lost child, that his relationship with little Frank began to transform, and that he would bring the lost child home. According to the paper, ink, printing technology and other factors of the check, banking experts have deduced that the place of printing of the check should be in Europe, most likely in France. Being the person who already understood Frank very well, Carl judged that he was hiding in the French Morid, because that place was his mother's hometown, his parents met here and fell in love with each other. That was the source of Frank's love, there was his inner longing for his parents, the whole family reunion. And Frank hid in the printing house near the church in the city of Montreu. At this time, he had grown up, and gradually realized that no matter how much wealth he deceived, he could not let his parents return to the family as it was before. So in reality he was desperate, completely desperate, he was even a little tired of drifting. This was where Carl caught him, no, Carl found him. In fact, it was also a self-rescue operation for Agent Carl. I felt that Carl treated Frank more like he was his own son, he was the one who brought him home to an exotic country on the brink of illness and death; it was a man who visited him in prison one lonely Christmas; he was also the person who gave Frank a second life; and he was the only one who understood Frank's childish heart. There was a heart wrenching thing about Frank that he hadn't thought about. He understood that in Frank's heart he had always desired the warmth of affection and family reunion. Only he knew Frank better and Carl eventually led him on the right path. So Frank finally came back and knew there was another man who cared for him and loved him. No matter how much Frank wasted his youth and escaped punishment, he seemed unable to get rid of the step by step pressure on him, which is not so much an activity as a responsibility, a duty. And Carl with the extradition to Frank's house, almost a clear metaphor, misguided teenagers, wandering through the prodigal son years, finally returning home, finally saved. Although Carl did not guard his house, but created a new home for the lost Frank, why isn't it another perfection? There's another reason why I love this movie, it's more specific and vivid about Frank's family. Cynicism, recklessness, this 'elite fan shyness' is probably the common character of father and son. Seeing here, the audience seems to have found the reason why Frank's father and son can be relaxed in any urgent and dangerous situation. Because they are natural, beautiful dears,!.