Thomas Mappes developed his theory of sexual morality through a Kantian Sexual Ethics, following the logic that one should never treat someone as a method for our own ends, we must treat others as ends in themselves. The Kantian principle is imbued with key ideas, such as “it is morally wrong for A to use B merely as a means to achieve A's ends” and that “using someone as a means is fine, but using someone merely as a means.” it is incompatible with their personality." Mappes makes clear that using someone means knowingly acting towards them in a way that goes against the need for our association with other people to be rooted in their voluntary and informed consent. However, there are two ways to threaten voluntary informed consent, which are deception (the informed part) and coercion (the voluntary part). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay According to Mappes, coercion comes in two forms: occurrent and dispositional. Casual coercion occurs when physical force is used, while dispositional coercion requires the threat of harm. Deception on the other hand, in this context, has to do with knowingly deceiving someone to further one's own ends. This could be applied to taking advantage of someone who is clearly drunk, deceiving children who are not of legal age to give consent, cheating on your partner and withholding information, and so on. Raja Halwani begins by stating that causal sex may have objectification, but it does not have the consequence. However, even if objectification occurs, the immorality of casual sex can be compensated for through other decisions. Therefore, this idea of ​​casual sex might be morally permissible. First, it is important to define the term “casual sex” as it is widely discussed in Halwani's vision of sexual morality. He defines it as “no strings attached sex, such that the consent of the parties does not imply any commitment beyond the act.” He continues this argument by saying that as long as the people involved in the casual sexual relationship do not use each other as mere tools for their own gratification, then this is morally permissible. This is where Mappes and Halwani would disagree because Mappes would still want there to be a level of respect evident even if both individuals are having casual sex, moral principles should apply to human behavior. Please note: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Another key idea of ​​Halwani's theory of sexual morality states that people have the choice to treat each other as objects or not. But if you treat someone like an object, then that's the only way you can treat them. It is implausible to say that one can treat an individual as someone who lacks the ability to make decisions, due to a lack of freedom, and also treat them in a way that promotes the idea that they can actually make choices and exercise freedom..