Communication can be perceived as a multifaceted phenomenon denoting dissimilar ideas for different individuals. Consequently, the use of non-standard English in the workplace may defeat the primary objective of the organization because workers may misinterpret different concepts and, as a result, create communication barriers (Odine 1616). This development is common in the case of businesses where communication is the axis around which the success or failure of a company depends. Using non-standard English in the formal work environment can result in the development of hostility and accusations among workers, an inability to get the full picture due to inadequate background information, as well as distrust and low morale among employees of an organization. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Non-standard English is very likely to cause the development of barriers to communication. Odine (1616) indicates that a set of factors delays the development of an environment in which communication is efficient. A poor communication style emerges when the person sending a message uses the wrong communication style or expresses their thoughts inadequately. This development makes it complicated for the recipient of the message to decipher the message, let alone understand it (Odine 1616). Confusion occurs when the correspondent is unable to recognize the possible causes of the loss. The use of non-standard English in an organization can lead to the development of this type of environment because different concepts have different meanings due to the effect of cultural influence. The use of non-standard English leads to a breakdown in communication, resulting in the development of hostility and accusations. Odine (1616) postulates that recognizing the circumstances triggered by communication problems resolves workplace dilemmas. Additionally, clear communication channels help employees resolve issues without resorting to blame-sharing. As a result, non-standard English can lead people to attach different meanings to specific concepts or ideas due to issues such as cultural influence. In this regard, workers may start to argue with each other because they cannot come to a common conclusion due to a breakdown in communication (Odine 1616). Indeed, some difficult situations are a direct consequence of unsuccessful communication practices, which include poor listening skills, use of unsuitable means, poor conceptualization of the message and lack of trust. Furthermore, the use of non-standard English may result in the development of a situation where employees do not receive adequate background information related to their organizational tasks. Using unorthodox English can lead to supervisors not providing their employees with desired background information or sufficient details regarding their tasks (Odine 1616). This occurrence can lead to communication problems, as well as a lack of perspective on how individuals can receive the message, particularly when complex issues are communicated. For this reason, poorly organized or written texts that contain typographical errors and errors are destined to generate communication difficulties and, consequently, create misunderstandings (Odine 1616). Selecting an unwanted channel or medium such as voicemail, email, letter, or conversation can create barriers in communication because the recipient may not be able to understand the underlying message if non-standard English is used. Finally, the unwanted effects of using English.