The integration of women into the recently closed MOS combat arms was an example of sloppy and ignorant leadership. The question “Why do sexual assault and harassment continue to occur today?” is responded with the failed system issued by the Army Headquarters Department HQDA AKA, to ensure the best results for this so-called plan/integration. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay On April 19, 2013, the HQDA tasked the 2020 Soldiers with creating an initiative that corresponded to the Army's intent to evaluate the conditions of combat MOSs physically, mentally, and emotionally from the female perspective . As the best way to compare male and female perspectives, this initiative reflects the importance of unit-level mitigation to control readiness and morale. Given the potential impacts, the study team used a phase-by-phase outcome to perform a “test” to determine a leveling factor and establish a comprehensive military standard. Despite a three-year review of risk factors to establish a comprehensive standard for women's supplementation, there has been a sudden spike in SHARP-related cases in recent years. According to the “Department of Defense Annual Report on Sexual Assault in the Military,” reports of sexual assault and harassment have increased by more than 5,000 cases per year since 2016. That year, the same year that the female population joined the combat MOS. .Implementing a fixed standard in the drives has proven difficult in combination with SHARP. In focus groups around the Army, primarily those from combat MOSs, it was perceived that the SHARP program creates an environment that causes discomfort with interaction and integration as a whole. The soldiers discuss the gray areas of regulation and when harmless attraction and flirting become a punishable crime under SHARP parameters. Confusion over how to set standards has led leadership to recommend avoiding anything other than the contact necessary to avoid charges. The SHARP program has helped numerous soldiers in many ways. However, the Army has been reported to improve how it handles allegations of sexual assault and harassment. As of now, commanders have full authority to decide whether or not to proceed with sexual assault charges. “The vast majority of military leaders support prosecution. But not against one of them. Members of a military unit share dangers. "They guard each other's flanks. They get closer." that's what Marco says. E. Johnson stated in his 2018 Duties and Purposes editorial. Leaders in the ranks must apply rigorous standards without any tolerance. However, it is argued that the judicial process, if carried out in private by military prosecutors, would result in thorough investigations and thorough punishments. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Higher reporting rates are an effect of a higher frequency of SHARP-related instances or simply more soldiers reporting. There is still no question that sexual harassment and assault are very concerning in today's military. If there are still SHARP reports and SHARP-related instances occurring at this volume, the SHARP program should not be considered satisfactory at all. References Kirby, Jen. “Pentagon report shows sharp increase in sexual assaults by.