Topic > Ways of analyzing international politics

Most of the tangible elements, theories, etc. they can be understood by a theory or be predicted. International politics helps us predict a state's next move, or even explain the reasons behind a state's action. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay By looking at international systems we can tend to predict the behavior or patterns of a state among sovereign states. We have seen the influence that the international political system has on its states, one such example is the Jay Treaty, which kept the United States in the Loop but left it out of the conflict. Although the United States was an isolated country in the 18th century (largely because it was weak and surrounded by powerful countries), it quickly realized that it had as much power as some of these states in the years to come. Political scientists are interested in the international system because it explains the behavior of states. Some renowned political scientists are J. David Singer and Kenneth Waltz. International politics goes beyond focusing on individuals but rather on the cluster, on the interaction between different states. Another way of analyzing international politics is to focus on key characteristics of society, which can help shape perceptions of the state. This includes everywhere: whether the country is democratic or authoritarian, or what is the size of the economy, what kind of ideology is the society based on? By answering these questions it is possible to understand the behavior or interests of some states. The last analysis is focused more on the outcome, or in other words on the explanation of everything. A political scientist analyzes and questions all of a state's motivations and interests. We can use this in our story, when the United States decided to expand, especially because they believed they were superior and prestigious, political scientists understood the force used against Mexico by the United States in the Mexican-American War. The Treaty of Guadalupe de Hidalgo was the result of this war, in which Mexico unjustly lost, and led to the expansion of America. When it comes to systematic structures and rules there are three different types: unipolar, bipolar and multipolar structures. Usually in multipolar systems there are smaller problems than in non-multipolar ones. These constructions are not stagnant, in fact a state can modify their systematic structures. This was seen in ancient Rome, Europe, the United States and the Soviet Union. In the 1700s Great Britain and France were in a multipolar system, until the late 1800s, and the United States became a unipolar system. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay The Monroe Doctrine essentially was created, its intentions were to drive away anyone attempting to oppress Latin America, and furthermore America would remain neutral if Europe decided to leave the United States and America to them Latin. Britain rejected the demands imposed by the Doctrine, but instead of entering the war the British backed down. In 1895 the United States had a strong economic society, but Great Britain remained even stronger in military forces. At the same time Germany began to push Britain, which soon took control of most of Western Europe. Yet we recognize less of the great power and size that Britain had. Britain's defeat also gave way to the United States and its relations with Latin America. Conclusion: finally we must.