Topic > George was justified in killing Lennie

Imagine being faced with an unbearable dilemma: having to choose between the life of your closest friend and your own survival. This is the difficult situation in which George Milton, the protagonist of John Steinbeck's story Of Mice and Men, finds himself. The question arises: Was George justified in killing Lennie? In this essay, we will explore the complex dynamics of George and Lennie's relationship, analyze the events that led to George's decision, and ultimately argue that George's actions were indeed justified. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Topic Sentence: To understand George's justification for killing Lennie, it is crucial to examine the unique bond between the two characters. Supporting Evidence: George and Lennie's friendship is characterized by a deep sense of responsibility for each other's well-being. From the beginning of the novella, it is clear that George feels a duty to protect Lennie, who has a cognitive disability. When George remembers how Lennie got them into trouble in their previous job, he says, "I made you take care of me, and you made me take care of you" (Steinbeck 14). This mutual trust and interdependence form the foundation of their relationship. Analysis: The depth of George's care for Lennie is further emphasized by the sacrifices he makes to ensure Lennie's safety. Despite the challenges that Lennie's presence brings, George willingly takes on the role of his caretaker. This responsibility is not only a burden but also an expression of George's love and loyalty towards Lennie. Therefore, when evaluating George's decision to kill Lennie, it is critical to consider the weight of this bond and the moral dilemma it presents. Topic Sentence: The tragic events that unfold throughout the story provide the context for George's actions. Supporting evidence: Lack of understanding and impulse control repeatedly leads to disastrous consequences. The inadvertent killing of small animals and ultimately the death of Curley's wife illustrate the danger he poses to himself and those around him. Furthermore, the pervasive prejudice and lack of understanding towards people with disabilities in the 1930s makes it unlikely that Lennie will receive any form of leniency or rehabilitation if caught by the authorities. Analysis: George is acutely aware of the potential consequences Lennie's actions could have. He knows that if caught, Lennie would face harsh and merciless punishment. Taking matters into his own hands, George not only spares Lennie from a painful fate, but also acts as a compassionate defender of his friend. The decision to end Lennie's life can be seen as an act of mercy, protecting him from further suffering and providing a measure of control over his destiny. Topic sentence: George's decision to kill Lennie is also influenced by the impact it has on the other characters in the novella. Supporting Evidence: The final act, while tragic, serves as a catalyst for change among the remaining characters. Slim, a wise and respected ranch hand, understands the complexity of the situation and consoles George by saying, "You got it, George. I swear you got it" (Steinbeck 107). This recognition suggests that George's decision was not only justified but also recognized as the most compassionate course of action. Analysis: George's action of killing Lennie stimulates reflection and introspection among the other characters. It forces them to face the harsh reality of their circumstances and question the society that,, 1994.