There has been a persistent controversy over whether fast food is better on the pocket than eating home-cooked meals. Take McDonald's for example, they are famous for their cheap and convenient menus. Since you can get a burger for just $1.19, feeding a family of four should be inexpensive, right? Mark Bittman, author of “Is Junk Food Really Cheaper?” claims the opposite. He claims that fast food is not any cheaper than buying a few groceries and cooking at home. Expresses the different myths about fast food, such as the fact that it is supposedly cheaper than real food when measured in calories, people's mentality that if it's not fast food, it must be expensive organic food, and that it simply doesn't exist You don't have enough time to cook at home. These myths followed by genuine factors such as addictions and cultural impact, help Bittman demonstrate the validity of his argument to his audience. I must say that Bittman demonstrated the effectiveness of his argument, as he clearly stated his thesis and provided various reliable sources. He says alternatives to fast food don't have to be grass-fed beef and organic vegetables, but pretty much anything that's healthier than junk. To support his argument, Bittman references Marion Nestle, professor of food studies at New York University and author of “What to Eat,” where he quotes her in paragraph 7 as saying, “Anything you do that isn't fast food is great ". ; cooking once a week is much better than not cooking at all. That said, it promotes the idea of ​​adopting a healthy diet even if only once a week. This source is helpful because it indicates that taking the initiative to eat healthier and sticking with it takes time, but is beneficial in the long run