On April 28, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals overturned a federal judge's ruling due to several problems that arose with government-funded stem cell research. Although human embryonic stem cell science is in its early stages, there is much hope for scientific advancement due to the ability of human embryonic stem cells to virtually grow into various cell types. On the positive side, supporters of stem cell research and pharmaceutical companies strongly believe that stem cells can pave the way for the discovery of new treatment methods for devastating diseases; such as leukemia, Alzheimer's disease, heart disease, Parkinson's disease and diabetes – a prospect that inspires both scientists and those seeking cures for themselves and their families. In contrast, many pro-life advocates oppose federal funding for stem cell research because of the method by which they are extracted. Additionally, many other groups argue that the federal government has abandoned more substantial, promising, and less controversial research on adult and cord blood stem cells. Instead, the government has devoted most of its funding to more popular and controversial stem cell research. Ultimately, as long as humans exist, the need for broader technological progress will be abundant and crucial to humanity's survival. However, do the needs of the human species outweigh the potential lives represented by embryos? With so much at stake, let's explore exactly what human embryonic stem cell (HESC) research is and what it could potentially tip the scales for the human race if we proceed down this path. Human embryonic stem cells are derived from over 100 types of... middle of paper... headlines on a regular basis there is no denying their importance, regardless of the controversies that may follow. Life-saving technologies are within our reach. It almost seems like maybe one day we will be able to order body parts from our doctor like we order car parts from our mechanic. However, what is the cost? At first glance, you might think the question is whether an embryo is actually a human being, but when you peel back the onion, the question is more ethical than scientific. If we don't share the same ideals/moral codes, how can we agree that human embryos deserve the same rights that you and I have. Because both moral principles – the duty to prevent vs. the duty to respect the value of human life – both are impossible to honor. That said, because our cultures are so different, there may never be a consensus between the two groups.