Favorite Selection Sundahl, Debi (1998) "Stripper." From Sex Work: Writings of Women in the Industry In “Stripper,” Debi Sundahl explains her knowledge and experiences of sex life while working as a sex object and also as a feminist in addition to being a liberator. Sundhal gets at the idea that sex workers are responsible for the sexual repression of women, stating that, indeed, for any free-thinking viewer the very existence of a sex worker “provides a distinction and a choice as to when a woman should be treated." as a sexual object and when it shouldn't be." In this article, Sundahl intends to invent a stranglehold on the sex business for women, accordingly; Sundhal started the first women-only strip show in 1984 at a lesbian inn in San Francisco, Sundhal argues that the fact that women are not vigorously involved in the sex business, in the roles of owners, bosses and customers, is highlighting the gendered view of the social order of opinion that the reality that women women have had virtually no erotic atmosphere is solely their own creation and for women, this experience is "intrinsically linked to the sexist attitude that a woman's role in society is to be a housewife/mother/sexual servant Sundhal". she was a highly successful stripper, as well as an entrepreneur and advocate for freedom of physical expression. Sundahl cross-examines prevailing gender roles; consequently she makes evident a system to undermine these roles as her article provides significant information about the feminist or social scholar who sought to have as a feature a structural investigation into the development of strippers. This article therefore provides the p...... half of the document ......ary agreement. But this could not be achieved if women were not considered free individuals. In both marriage and prostitution, Peteman argues, the woman must enter and remain as a free individual, but this is not the case for either political or personal interests. Therefore, in any type of contract, institutionalized or non-institutionalized, women continue to be subordinate to men in the contract. In my opinion, I don't like this article because it argues that in the profession of prostitution, women are not a party of free individuals in the same way that they are in marriage. The similarity depicted by the author is so great that no distinction is seen in the moral and immoral of marriage and prostitution. Furthermore, I didn't like this article due to its vagueness of expression and the changing structure of the paragraphs which is all the more confusing and very philosophical..